Documentation is work in progress and not completeEditor
Compare
FlashFX vs DaVinci Resolve
DaVinci Resolve is a full post-production suite — editing, colour grading, audio and the Fusion compositing environment — in one desktop application. FlashFX does one part of that job, motion graphics authoring, in a browser tab. The comparison is really about scope.
Scope
| FlashFX | DaVinci Resolve | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Motion graphics editor | Full post-production suite |
| Covers | Vector animation, text, images, 3D elements | Editing, colour grading, audio, VFX and compositing |
| Runs in | A web browser | Installed desktop application |
| Hardware | Runs on whatever runs the browser | Benefits substantially from a strong GPU |
| Learning curve | Focused on one job | Broad, with a distinct interface per page of the suite |
Resolve includes Fusion, a node-based compositing and motion graphics environment. Node graphs are powerful and precise, but they are a different mental model from a layer-and-timeline editor, and the ramp is steeper.
When FlashFX Fits Better
- •You want to produce a piece of motion graphics without installing and learning a full suite.
- •You are working on the web — UI motion, site animation, social graphics — and want SVG or WebM output directly.
- •You are on a machine that will not comfortably run a heavy desktop application.
- •You need several people editing in a shared workspace (Teams plan).
- •You want a layer-and-timeline model rather than a node graph.
When Resolve Fits Better
- •You need colour grading. This is what Resolve is most known for and FlashFX does not attempt it.
- •You are editing long-form video with audio post.
- •You need node-based compositing with tracking and keying.
- •You want a single application covering the whole post pipeline.
Using Both
A practical split is to author graphics in FlashFX and export them for use in Resolve. FlashFX exports MP4, GIF, WebM and SVG on every plan, so graphics can move into a Resolve timeline without a paid upgrade.